From the blog CRM and software

Room visualizers for flooring companies: what they actually do, and what to ask before you buy one

A visualizer lets a homeowner see a product in their own room instead of imagining it off a two inch sample. Here is where it belongs in the sale, what separates a toy from a tool, and the ownership question almost nobody asks the vendor.

Soroush Farokhi, ProfitPlus Media11 min read

A room visualizer does one thing. A homeowner takes a photo of their own hallway, picks a product, and sees it on their own floor instead of holding a two inch sample against it. That is the entire idea, and it is worth understanding properly before you pay anybody a monthly fee for it.

Why it works, and the part vendors will not tell you

Selling flooring means asking somebody to spend thousands of dollars on a picture in their head. They are standing in a showroom under commercial lighting, holding a sample the size of a postcard, being asked to imagine four hundred square feet of it in a room they are not currently in. Plenty of people simply cannot do that. When somebody says they need to think about it, a real share of the time what they mean is that they cannot picture it and are not going to gamble on it.

There is a second, quieter reason. The person standing in front of you is usually not the only decision maker, and the other one is at work. A render on a phone is something the homeowner can show them at dinner. A sample in a bag is not.

Here is what we are not going to do: quote you a close rate lift. Every vendor in this category has a percentage on their homepage and none of them show the study behind it. Any number produced without your market, your product mix and your salespeople in it is a guess wearing a decimal point. If you want a real figure, measure your own: track close rate on estimates where the homeowner saw their own room against ones where they did not, over enough jobs to mean something. That number is yours and it is worth more than anybody’s brochure.

Measuring it is not hard. Put one box on your estimate sheet, saw a render or did not, and read the two close rates after a quarter. If it moved nothing in your market, stop paying for it. That test costs you a checkbox.

The three places it belongs

A visualizer is not one tool used once. It does a different job at each of three moments, and most companies only use one of them.

  1. Before the visit. On your website or landing page, it gives a browsing homeowner a reason to hand over their details that is not "request a free quote", which everybody asks for and nobody wants to give. It also tells you what they were looking at before you ever knock, so the person who calls them already knows the product and the room.
  2. In the home. On a tablet at the kitchen table, at the exact moment somebody hesitates over a wider plank or a darker color. This is the highest value use and the one most companies skip. Do not send them a link. Do it with them, in the room, on the wall they are worried about.
  3. In the follow-up. The week after an estimate is where most sales quietly die, because the only thing anybody sends is "just checking in", which contains no information and invites no reply. A render of the option they were unsure about is a reason to make contact that respects the customer.

Using it in the home, in three moves

The mistake is treating it as a reveal. It is not a magic trick, it is a way of removing doubt, so it works best when the homeowner drives it.

  1. Ask what they are unsure about, then stop talking. Wider plank. Darker color. Whether the grey reads cold in a north facing room. Whatever they say next is the thing to render.
  2. Take the photo from where they stand, not from the flattering angle. The doorway they walk through every morning, in the light that is actually in that room at that hour.
  3. Render the option they are worried about first, not the one you would rather sell. If it looks wrong on their own screen you have just saved everybody a callback, and you have earned the right to suggest the next one.

Then stop. Two renders is a decision and six is paralysis. Send the two they liked in one message with the written scope attached, and put the follow-up date in the calendar before you leave the driveway.

Toy or tool: seven things that separate them

  1. Bad photo handling. Real customer photos are crooked, dim and full of furniture. Test any product with three deliberately terrible photos, not with the demo images in the gallery.
  2. Your catalogue, not a generic library. If the homeowner falls in love with a product you do not stock, the tool just sold your job to somebody else. Ask how your own products get in, who does that work and how often it can be updated.
  3. Speed. A render that takes thirty seconds gets abandoned. Time it on a phone on a normal connection, not on the office wifi.
  4. It has to work on a phone. That is where the homeowner is. A tool that only behaves on a desktop is a showroom toy.
  5. Lead capture into your own system. The contact details, the room photo and the chosen product should arrive in your CRM as one record, ready for somebody to call. If the render and the lead live in different places, nobody will ever use them together.
  6. Attribution. You should be able to answer, six months later, how many booked estimates started in the visualizer. If the tool cannot tell you that, you are guessing about whether to keep paying for it.
  7. Export. Can you get the list, the photos and the renders out, in a usable format, without asking permission?

The question almost nobody asks the vendor

Who owns what. It sounds like a lawyer’s question and it is actually the commercial one. Three parts, and ask all three before the demo ends:

  1. When a homeowner enters an email to receive their render, whose database does that contact land in first, and can you export it whenever you want.
  2. Whose branding does the homeowner see while they are using it, on the render itself and on the email that delivers it.
  3. If you stop paying, what happens to the renders, the list and the page it lived on.

None of those answers are automatically wrong. Plenty of good products are rented rather than owned. But you should know which one you are buying, and the same standard belongs on everybody you pay: the account, the CRM, the domain and the data are yours, and so is the list a visualizer builds. It is the same test we publish about our own trade in the seven questions.

Build or subscribe

Both are defensible. The honest trade looks like this:

 SubscribeBuild your own
Time to liveDaysWeeks
Money shapeMonthly, and it usually rises with your own trafficCost up front, then hosting
Product libraryTheirs, broad, not always what you stockYours, exactly, including prices if you want them
Where the lead landsTheir system, then maybe yoursYour CRM, first
Who fixes itTheir support queueWhoever built it, so pick that carefully
If you walk awayIt switches offYou keep it

The dividing line is not company size. It is how much of your selling actually runs through the thing. If it is a pleasant extra on a quiet website, rent it and spend your attention elsewhere. If it sits in the middle of how you sell, if the fees climb every time your own advertising works, or if you need your real catalogue and your real prices inside it, a build stops being an indulgence and starts being cheaper.

We build custom visualizers for flooring companies, so treat that paragraph as interested rather than neutral, and hold us to the same three ownership questions above.

What a visualizer will not fix

It will not rescue a lead that was sold to four other companies at the same time, and it will not make up for calling somebody back six hours after they asked. Those causes sit upstream of anything you can show on a screen, and they are the three real reasons inquiries go quiet. It also will not close somebody who never intended to buy this year, which is what "I need to think about it" usually means. A visualizer is a very good answer to one specific objection. Buying it to solve a lead quality problem is buying the wrong thing well.

Ten questions for any vendor

  1. Can I see it running on three of my own bad photos, now?
  2. How do my products get into it, and who does that work?
  3. How long does one render take on a phone, on cell data?
  4. Where does the lead land, and how fast?
  5. Can I export the contacts and the renders myself?
  6. Whose branding does the homeowner see?
  7. What does the price do when my traffic doubles?
  8. What is the contract length and the exit?
  9. What breaks most often, and who answers at 9pm?
  10. What does it not do well? If the answer is nothing, leave.

That last one is the tell. Every real tool has a weak spot, and a vendor who will name theirs is a vendor telling you the truth about the rest. While you are counting, the numbers that decide whether any of this paid off are the five every owner should be able to state.

Questions people actually ask

Does a room visualizer actually raise close rates?

We are not going to hand you a percentage, because we do not have one we could defend and neither does anybody else quoting you one. What we can tell you is the mechanism: it removes the part of the decision the homeowner is worst at, which is imagining a whole floor from a two inch sample. If you want a number, get your own. Track close rate on estimates where the homeowner saw their own room and estimates where they did not, over a few dozen jobs. That number is worth more than any figure in any brochure, because it is yours.

Do I need professional photos of the customer’s room?

No, and a tool that needs them is not much use. A homeowner takes the photo on their phone, usually in bad light with furniture in the way. The whole job of good software is to handle that gracefully: hold the perspective, keep the shadows sensible, and stop at the walls. Test any product with three deliberately bad photos before you believe the marketing gallery.

Where do the leads from a visualizer go?

Ask that question before you sign anything, because the answer differs sharply by vendor. In some products the homeowner enters an email to get their render and that contact lands in the vendor’s database first and yours second, or not at all. In others it posts straight into your own CRM with the product and the room attached. The second one is a lead. The first one is somebody else’s lead that mentioned your name.

Should I put it on my website or only use it in the home?

Both, for different reasons. On the site it works before the visit: it gives a browsing homeowner a reason to hand over their details and it tells you what product they were looking at before you ever knock. In the home it works at the moment of hesitation, when somebody cannot picture the wider plank in their own hallway. The uses reinforce each other and neither replaces the other.

Is it worth building a custom one instead of subscribing?

It depends on how much of your selling runs through it. If it is a nice extra on a quiet website, subscribe and spend your money elsewhere. If it is genuinely part of how you sell, if you are paying fees that rise with your own traffic, or if you need your real catalogue and your real prices in it, then a build starts paying for itself and you keep the renders, the list and the flow at the end of it. The honest version of the trade is that a build costs more up front and somebody has to maintain it.

What if my suppliers already offer one?

Use it, and read the terms. A manufacturer visualizer is built to sell that manufacturer’s catalogue, which is fine while your interests line up and awkward when they stop. Check whose branding the homeowner sees, whether the contact details reach you, and whether you can still use the tool if you change what you stock.

Keep reading

If you want one built on your own catalogue, with the leads landing in your own system, that is work we do. It starts with a 15-minute phone call, and you can book one here.

All posts